Pricing, Set Out Plainly
Published prices for fat freezing treatment, an explanation of how the per-area model works, and an honest account of what is and is not included.
Price is one of the first things people want to know and one of the last things most services are willing to state clearly. The pattern is familiar: a range without context, a “from” figure that applies to nobody, or a form to fill in before any number appears at all. That approach is designed to get people into a conversation before they have enough information to evaluate whether they want one.
The published fat freezing prices are set out in full on this page, exactly as they stand. Where a treatment does not have a published price, that is stated openly rather than concealed behind an enquiry form — and this page explains why those treatments are quoted individually and what determines the figure.
It is worth saying at the outset that price is a poor way to choose a provider in isolation. A cheaper session delivered without proper assessment, on someone for whom the treatment is not appropriate, is not good value at any figure. The most useful thing to compare between providers is not the number but what the number buys: the quality of the assessment, the honesty of the expectation-setting, and whether anyone is prepared to tell you that a treatment is not right for you.
Transparent published pricing for Lipo Freeze non-surgical treatments
Replace with a real image laterFat Freezing Treatment Prices
The following prices apply to fat freezing treatment (cryolipolysis) and are priced by the number of areas treated. Figures are current as of August 2026.
Pricing is structured around areas rather than sessions, which is the model that makes most sense for a contouring treatment. The cost of treating a given number of areas is the same whether those areas are on the abdomen, the flanks, the thighs or the back. The figure below covers the treatment of that number of areas in a single appointment.
| Areas treated | Price |
|---|---|
| 1 Area | £210 |
| 2 Areas | £325 |
| 3 Areas | £425 |
| 4 Areas | £500 |
| 5 Areas | £560 |
| 6 Areas | £600 |
Scroll the table sideways on smaller screens to see every column.
Two-Person Pricing
Where two people are treated at the same appointment, a combined price applies. The figures below are the total for both people, with the saving shown per person compared with two separate single bookings.
| Areas treated | Total price | Saving |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Area – 2 persons | £345 | Save £38 per person |
| 2 Areas – 2 persons | £535 | Save £58 per person |
| 3 Areas – 2 persons | £700 | Save £75 per person |
| 4 Areas – 2 persons | £825 | Save £88 per person |
| 5 Areas – 2 persons | £925 | Save £98 per person |
| 6 Areas – 2 persons | £990 | Save £105 per person — best value |
Scroll the table sideways on smaller screens to see every column.
Please note: prices can differ depending on the treatment package selected and are subject to confirmation at consultation. The figures above are the published fat freezing prices current as of August 2026 and should be treated as accurate at that date rather than as a permanent guarantee.
Understanding the Per-Area Model
Almost every question about fat freezing pricing resolves to a single one: what counts as an area, and how many do I need?
What an area means
An area corresponds to a single applicator placement — one defined region of the body that the applicator can properly draw and cool in one go. The abdomen is not automatically a single area; depending on its size and how the fat is distributed, it may require one placement or two. The flanks are normally counted as two areas because there is one on each side. The inner thighs are likewise two, as are the outer thighs and the upper arms.
This is the point at which people most often mis-estimate their own cost. Someone thinking of “my stomach and my love handles” as two things is frequently looking at three or four areas once the applicator placements are mapped out. Conversely, someone assuming a whole region will be expensive may find that a single well-placed applicator addresses the specific pocket that actually bothers them. This is precisely why an accurate figure comes from assessment rather than from a page.
Why the cost per area falls as areas increase
The published prices are not a simple multiple. One area is £210; six areas are £600, which is well under three times the single-area price rather than six times it. The per-area cost drops steadily as the number rises — from £210 for one, to roughly £163 each at two areas, £142 at three, £125 at four, £112 at five and £100 at six.
The reason is straightforward. A substantial portion of what any appointment costs is fixed regardless of how many areas are treated: the travel, the setup, the consultation and suitability assessment, and the practitioner’s time in attending. Treating additional areas within the same appointment spreads those fixed elements across more treatment, which is why the marginal cost of each additional area falls.
What that should and should not influence
The structure creates a genuine incentive to treat more areas at once, and it is worth being clear-eyed about that. If several areas genuinely concern you, treating them together is materially better value than returning for each one separately. If they do not, adding areas to reach a better per-area rate is spending more money to buy treatment you did not want. The falling rate is a sensible reflection of how appointment costs work, not a reason to expand a plan beyond what the assessment supports.
| Areas | Total | Approx. per area |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | £210 | £210 |
| 2 | £325 | £163 |
| 3 | £425 | £142 |
| 4 | £500 | £125 |
| 5 | £560 | £112 |
| 6 | £600 | £100 |
Per-area figures are calculated from the published totals and rounded to the nearest pound.
Two-Person Bookings Explained
The two-person rate reflects the same logic as multi-area pricing: shared appointment costs, shared saving.
When two people are treated at the same appointment, the fixed costs of that appointment — travel, setup, the practitioner attending a single location once rather than twice — are shared between them. The published two-person prices pass a proportion of that efficiency on, and the saving rises with the number of areas treated: £38 per person at one area, through to £105 per person at six areas, which the reference pricing identifies as the best-value option.
How to read the two-person figures
The prices shown are the total for both people combined, not per person. “3 Areas – 2 persons £700” means three areas treated for each person, at a combined cost of £700, with each person saving £75 against what two separate single bookings would have cost. Reading these figures as per-person totals is the most common misunderstanding, and it produces an unpleasant surprise in one direction or a disappointed one in the other.
Suitability is still assessed individually
This is the important qualification and it is worth stating firmly. A shared appointment does not mean a shared assessment. Each person is evaluated separately for suitability, medical history and contraindications, and each person’s treatment plan is determined on their own circumstances. It is entirely possible for one person in a pair to be suitable and the other not — and where that is the case, the appropriate outcome is that only one is treated, regardless of what was booked.
This matters because a two-person booking carries a social pressure that a single booking does not. Someone attending with a partner or a friend may feel obliged to proceed with a treatment they have just been told is not ideal for them. Nobody should feel that. The saving is a pricing arrangement; it is not a reason to accept unsuitable treatment.
- Both people are assessed separately for suitability and contraindications.
- The published figure is the combined total for both people.
- Each person receives the stated number of areas.
- Either person may decline or be advised against treatment independently.
- Treatment plans are set individually, not matched for convenience.
- Savings rise with the number of areas treated.
What the Price Covers
A treatment price is not only the treatment. Understanding what surrounds it is what makes comparison between providers meaningful.
When people compare prices between providers, they almost always compare the headline figure and almost never compare what that figure includes. Two apparently similar prices can represent quite different propositions once the surrounding elements are accounted for.
Consultation and suitability assessment
Every treatment is preceded by a consultation reviewing medical history and confirming suitability. This is not an optional extra or a sales meeting — it is the stage at which contraindications are identified and at which a person may properly be advised that a treatment is not appropriate for them. A provider who treats without this stage is cheaper for a reason.
Treatment delivered at home
Treatment takes place at the client’s own address. There is no separate travel or call-out charge layered onto the published prices — the at-home model is how the service operates rather than a premium option within it. Practically, this also removes the cost and time of travelling to a clinic, which is a real if unstated part of what treatment elsewhere costs.
Aftercare guidance and follow-up
Clear aftercare guidance is provided, along with an honest account of when results should be expected to appear. Because these treatments develop over weeks, knowing what is normal at week two as against week eight is a material part of the value. Follow-up support remains available rather than ending when the appointment does.
What is not included
Additional sessions are priced separately. Where a first fat freezing session produces a good but partial result, a further session on the same area is a new booking at the published rate for the number of areas involved. Where a course is recommended for another treatment, each session within that course is a separate appointment. Nothing on this page should be read as implying that a course is included within a single published figure.
Confirm before booking. Accepted payment methods, deposit requirements, cancellation and rescheduling terms are confirmed directly at the point of booking. They are not listed on this page because publishing terms that have not been verified would be worse than publishing none. Ask for them explicitly before committing.
Treatments Quoted at Consultation
Body toning, pelvic floor and incontinence treatment, and vaginal tightening do not have published per-session figures on this page, and inventing them would be worse than leaving them out.
The published pricing above covers fat freezing treatment. The other treatments described on the Services page are quoted individually at consultation. Rather than fill the gap with an estimate, it is more useful to explain what determines the figure so that the quotation makes sense when it arrives.
Body toning
Pricing here is driven by the course rather than the single session, because the treatment is designed around a minimum of four to six sessions spaced at least two days apart. A single session in isolation is not the treatment. The relevant variables are the number of areas being conditioned, the number of sessions in the recommended course and whether the plan is being combined with another treatment.
Pelvic floor and incontinence treatment
The standard course comprises six to eight sessions, generally twice weekly over approximately three weeks, followed by maintenance sessions every three to twelve months. The quotation therefore reflects the course rather than the individual appointment, and any subsequent maintenance is a separate consideration determined by how symptoms respond over time.
Vaginal tightening
Most women are described as benefiting from three treatments spaced four to six weeks apart, with maintenance sometimes recommended annually. Because the interval between sessions is deliberate — it exists to allow collagen remodelling to develop — the pricing conversation is naturally about a programme running over several months rather than a single appointment.
Why individual quotation is the honest approach
For all three of these treatments, the number of sessions genuinely depends on the individual assessment. Publishing a single figure would require either quoting the minimum, which would understate the real cost for most people, or quoting a range so wide as to be useless. Neither helps anyone plan. A quotation given after assessment reflects what the person will actually need.
Planning the Cost Sensibly
Because most of these treatments develop over months, the useful budgeting question is not what a session costs but what the whole plan costs across its actual timeline.
Budget for the assessment point, not just the first session
With fat freezing, the outcome of a first session cannot be properly judged until eight to twelve weeks afterwards. A sensible plan therefore treats the first booking as complete in itself, and treats any further session as a separate decision made at that later point with actual information. Committing in advance to a second session that may not be needed is a common and avoidable expense.
Treat everything you want treated in one appointment
Where several areas genuinely concern you, the per-area pricing means treating them together is substantially better value than returning for each separately. Six areas at £600 works out at £100 each, against £210 for a single area treated alone. If you know at the outset that three areas bother you, treating all three at £425 is meaningfully better than three separate £210 appointments.
Where a course is involved, cost the course
For body toning, pelvic floor conditioning and vaginal tightening, the meaningful figure is the course rather than the session, because a partial course produces a partial result. Costing only the first session and hoping to decide later tends to produce either an abandoned course or an unplanned expense. Ask for the course figure at consultation.
Account for maintenance where it applies
Some results hold structurally and need no maintenance — cleared fat cells do not return to the treated area. Others decline gradually and may warrant periodic sessions: vaginal tightening results last several months to over a year with annual maintenance sometimes recommended, and pelvic floor benefits are typically maintained every three to twelve months. Where maintenance applies, factoring it in from the start gives a truer picture of long-term cost.
Do not let price drive the choice of treatment
The cheapest treatment that does not address your concern is the most expensive thing you can buy. If a stubborn pocket of fat is the issue, muscle conditioning will not resolve it however it is priced. Matching the mechanism to the concern comes first; comparing cost comes afterwards, within the options that are actually appropriate.
Questions Worth Asking Any Provider About Price
These apply to any provider, including this one. A service confident in its pricing will answer all of them without hesitation.
How many areas does my plan actually involve?
Since fat freezing is priced per area, this single answer determines your cost. Ask for the applicator placements to be mapped out explicitly rather than described in general terms, so you know whether “the stomach” means one area or two before you commit to anything.
Is the consultation included, and is it a genuine assessment?
Ask specifically whether the consultation reviews medical history and contraindications, and whether it can conclude that treatment is unsuitable. A consultation that can only ever conclude in favour of booking is not an assessment.
Is this a single session or a course, and what is the total?
For any treatment designed around a course, the session price is not the cost of the treatment. Ask for the full course figure, the number of sessions and the interval between them before deciding.
What happens if I need a further session?
Ask how a partial result is handled and what an additional session would cost. The answer tells you a great deal — particularly whether further sessions are presented as a considered clinical decision or as the standard response to any outcome.
What are the payment, deposit and cancellation terms?
Get these confirmed explicitly before booking rather than discovering them afterwards. Any provider should be able to state them clearly and immediately.
Will you tell me if this treatment is not right for me?
The most revealing question of all. The correct answer is an unqualified yes, with examples of the circumstances in which that conclusion would be reached.
How to Compare Prices Between Providers Fairly
Comparing headline figures across providers is almost always misleading, because the figures are rarely measuring the same thing.
Anyone researching non-surgical treatment quickly discovers a wide spread of advertised prices, and the natural instinct is to treat the spread as a straightforward measure of value. In practice, the variation usually reflects differences in what is being sold rather than differences in how competitively the same thing is priced. Three factors account for most of it.
Different definitions of a session
The most common source of confusion is that one provider’s “session” is not another’s. A price quoted per applicator is not comparable with a price quoted per appointment, which in turn is not comparable with a price quoted per area. A figure that looks half the price may cover a quarter of the treatment. Before comparing two numbers, establish what quantity of treatment each one buys — how many areas, how many applicator placements, how long the appointment runs.
The same problem arises with course-based treatments in an even more pronounced form. A per-session price for a treatment that requires six to eight sessions is not the cost of the treatment; it is roughly one seventh of it. Comparing one provider’s per-session figure against another’s full course price produces a conclusion that is not merely inaccurate but inverted.
Different inclusions around the treatment
A price that excludes consultation, charges separately for travel, or treats aftercare guidance and follow-up as optional extras will naturally appear lower than one that includes them. This is not necessarily dishonest — it is a different commercial structure — but it makes the headline figures non-comparable. The useful comparison is the total cost of everything you will actually need, from first assessment through to follow-up, rather than the number that appears first.
Travel and call-out charges deserve particular attention in a home-based context. Where treatment is delivered at the client’s address, whether that delivery is included in the published price or added afterwards can move the effective total significantly. Ask directly rather than assuming either way.
Different standards of assessment
This is the factor least visible in a price comparison and the most consequential. A provider who treats without a proper suitability assessment carries lower costs than one who does not, and can price accordingly. The saving is real, and so is what has been removed to achieve it. Fat freezing carries genuine contraindications — cold-related conditions, hernia at the site, pregnancy and breastfeeding among them — and body toning carries an extensive list of absolute restrictions including metal implants, cardiac conditions, epilepsy and pregnancy. A process that does not reliably identify these is cheaper because it is doing less, and what it is not doing is the part that protects you.
There is a straightforward test. Ask a provider to describe the circumstances in which they would tell you that treatment is not appropriate. A service with a genuine assessment process will answer specifically and without hesitation, because it happens regularly. A service without one will answer in generalities or redirect to how suitable you probably are.
A practical approach. Write down the complete plan you are being offered — number of areas, number of sessions, interval between them, what happens if a further session is needed, and what is included around the treatment itself. Then ask each provider to price that same plan. Comparing like against like is far more informative than comparing whichever number each provider chose to advertise.
Thinking About Value Across the Whole Timeline
Because these treatments produce results that persist for months or years, cost is more usefully understood across that period than at the moment of payment.
A single figure paid on one day feels like the cost of the treatment. In practice, the more informative question is what that figure buys over the period during which the result actually lasts, and the answer varies considerably between the treatments described on this site.
Structurally persistent results
Fat cells cleared through cryolipolysis do not return to the treated area, and the fat reduction achieved through body toning is described as permanent where weight remains stable. For these, the payment is essentially one-off for that area, subject to maintaining a broadly stable weight. There is no scheduled recurring cost built into the result itself. Someone treating three areas at £425 and maintaining their weight is not looking at an annual renewal of that expense.
Results that require periodic renewal
Collagen-mediated results behave differently, because new collagen is subject to the same gradual decline as collagen elsewhere in the body. Vaginal tightening results are described as lasting several months to over a year, with maintenance sometimes recommended annually. Muscle conditioning gains last a minimum of six months where regular exercise continues, but muscle that goes unused will detrain as it would after stopping any training programme. For these, an honest view of cost includes the likely renewal interval.
Functional results and quality of life
Pelvic floor treatment sits somewhat outside this framing, because what it delivers is not an appearance but a change in daily function — whether coughing or lifting still causes leakage, whether urgency still disrupts sleep, whether abandoned activities become possible again. Effects are described as persisting for years with maintenance every three to twelve months. Weighing that against a course cost is a different kind of calculation from weighing an aesthetic outcome, and for many people it resolves differently.
The cost of the wrong treatment
The largest avoidable expense in this field is not an overpriced session but a well-priced session of something that was never going to address the concern. Paying £210 for a treatment that does not fit the problem costs more than paying £425 for one that does. This is why assessment precedes pricing in any sensible process, and why the question of which mechanism suits your concern should be settled before the question of what it costs is even raised.
What is not worth paying for
It is equally worth naming the things that add cost without adding value: additional areas included to reach a better per-area rate rather than because they concern you; a second session booked before the first has been properly assessed at eight to twelve weeks; a course extended beyond what the response justifies; and any treatment recommended without a clear explanation of what it will address that the previous one did not. Each of these is a real expense, and each is avoidable by asking why.
Frequently Asked Questions About Pricing
What exactly counts as one area?
An area corresponds to a single applicator placement — one defined region the applicator can properly draw and cool. The abdomen may be one area or two depending on size and fat distribution. Flanks are normally two, one per side, as are inner thighs, outer thighs and upper arms. Because this determines your total cost under a per-area model, it is worth having the placements mapped out explicitly at consultation rather than estimated in advance.
Why is six areas only £600 when one area is £210?
Because a substantial part of what an appointment costs is fixed regardless of how many areas are treated — travel, setup, the consultation and the practitioner’s attendance. Treating more areas within the same appointment spreads those fixed costs further, so the marginal cost of each additional area falls. It works out at roughly £100 per area at six, against £210 for a single area treated alone.
Is the two-person price per person or in total?
In total. “3 Areas – 2 persons £700” means three areas treated for each person at a combined cost of £700, with each saving £75 against two separate single bookings. This is the most frequent misreading of the two-person table, so it is worth confirming when you book.
Why are other treatments not priced on this page?
Because body toning, pelvic floor conditioning and vaginal tightening are all designed around courses whose length depends on individual assessment, and publishing a single figure would either understate the real cost or give a range too wide to be useful. Quoting after assessment reflects what a person will actually need. Inventing a figure to fill the gap would be worse than leaving it open.
Do prices include the consultation?
Yes — a consultation reviewing medical history and confirming suitability precedes treatment in every case and is part of the process rather than an add-on. It is also the stage at which someone may properly be advised that a treatment is not appropriate for them, which is a meaningful part of what the price buys.
Is there a charge for treatment at home?
The at-home model is how the service operates rather than a premium option within it, and there is no separate call-out charge layered onto the published prices. It also removes the time and cost of travelling to a clinic, which is a real if rarely-stated part of what treatment elsewhere costs.
How much should I budget in total?
For fat freezing, budget for the areas you want treated in a single appointment, and treat any further session as a separate decision made at the eight-to-twelve week assessment point rather than committed to in advance. For course-based treatments, ask for the full course figure at consultation. Where maintenance applies — annually for vaginal tightening, every three to twelve months for pelvic floor — factor that in from the start for a truer long-term picture.
Are these prices fixed?
They are the published figures current as of August 2026, and prices can differ depending on the treatment package selected. They are confirmed at consultation. Treat them as accurate at that date rather than as a permanent guarantee, and confirm the current figure before booking.
What payment methods and cancellation terms apply?
These are confirmed directly at the point of booking. They are not published on this page because stating terms that have not been verified would be misleading. Ask for them explicitly, in writing if you prefer, before committing to an appointment.
Is the cheapest option ever the right one?
Only when it is also the appropriate one. A cheaper treatment that does not address your concern is not value — a muscle-conditioning treatment will not resolve a stubborn pocket of fat however competitively it is priced. Establish which mechanism actually fits the concern first, then compare cost within the options that are genuinely suitable.